Monday, January 31, 2011

Transmedia Storytelling


Transmedia storytelling is the way in which a story is told through multiple media platforms (video games, websites, books, etc.), and each element contributes to a fan’s immersion into the story. Transmedia storytelling can also be viewed as “New Hollywood’s” active marketing technique that has created media franchises.

Convergence Culture uses The Blair Witch Project as the paradigm for transmedia storytelling that began in 1999. Dan Myrick—the producer and director—explained, “To think of The Blair Witch Project as a film was to miss the bigger picture” (103). The book further explained this idea of transmedia storytelling through T.B.W.P as an occurrence in media platforms both before and after the film hit the theatres.

Before T.B.W.P was screened in theatres, it hit several media platforms such as the web and the Sci Fi Channel. These two platforms set the preliminary information needed to understand the concept of the “Witch.” For instance, the website—created a year before the film—explained the Burkittsville witch and the disappearance of the movie crew. Dan Myrick also stated, “The site provided documentation of numerous witch sightings over the past centuries…[which] forms the backdrop for its action” (104). The Sci Fi Channel also set the backdrop of T.B.W.P by investigating the witch in the movie. Ultimately, these two media platforms served as “the part for whole” of the transmedia story as they lured the audience into T.B.W.P before it even hit theatres.

After T.B.W.P hit theatres, the witch phenomenon continued to grow through other media platforms such as a comic book, soundtrack, and another website. For instance, Ed Sanchez—a crew member of T.B.W.P—wanted to continue with the Blair Witch phenomenon by creating a website that was framed in such a way to make it seem as though people were investigating the witch as though the witch really existed. Ed Sanchez stated, “We started fabricating artifacts, paintings, carvings, old books, and I would scan them in…What we learned from Blair Witch is that if you give people enough stuff to explore, they will explore” (105). Thus, T.B.W.P is not only a movie, but a transmedia story that unfolded through several layers of different media outlets.  

As transmedia storytelling is implemented as a marketing strategy, I see a clash between old Hollywood and new Hollywood. Jenkins explained, “The old Hollywood depended on redundancy to ensure that viewers could follow the plot at all times…The new Hollywood demands that we keep our eyes on the road at all times, and that we do research before we arrive at the theater.” Although the new Hollywood has turned us onto transmedia stories where we become active audience members who “do research before we arrive at the theatre,” I still miss old Hollywood. Yes, the futuristic and thought provoking films like The Matrix are fascinating, but I miss the “redundancy” used in old Hollywood films like Gone With the Wind and Casablanca.

Now the question is, what will define a movie as a “classic” according to new Hollywood? Will a “classic” be the movie that engaged the audience the most through different media platforms?

Is the redundancy of old Hollywood so bad?

Another question that comes to mind is how can transmedia storytelling be used to be a money making tool? I can think of one example of the top of my head—Entourage. HBO could have made more money off of Entourage by using transmedia storytelling. For example, HBO could have made “Aqua Man” into an actual movie played by Vince, or Median could have been based on a novel. Just think of all the possibilities! What other shows or movies would work with transmedia storytelling?

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Cybersubculture Culture Topics

For my cybersubculture comparison, I would like to compare Qwiki and Wikipedia.

Qwiki like Wikipedia is a site that has improved the way people experience information. They emphasize storytelling rather than "searching" when you want to find out about a restaurant, person, place, etc. Unlike Wikipedia's textual online articles that explain information about a topic, Qwiki allows people to learn about topics through an interactive video that tells a story about that specific topic.

Other interesting info:
Qwiki is a new site as of last October, and was founded by Facebook's co-founder Ewardo Saverin (the nice guy from the "Social Network" who was duped by Mark Zuckerberg). The team that continually modifies and runs Qwiki are a diverse group who are from all over the world.

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

The Knowledge Community of "Survivor Sucks" Applied to the Knowledge Community of WikiLeaks


In reading Chapter 1, “Spoiling Survivor—The Anatomy of a Knowledge Community,” of Henry Jenkin’s Convergence Culture, I realized that on a profound level we can parallel the knowledge communities that follow Survivor to the knowledge communities that follow our government.

As we live in a culture that infuses technology in our day to day lives, it is easy to discover everything about a person, place, or in my example our government. Recently, WikiLeaks can be seen as the epitome of this example. WikiLeaks—the non-profit organization that publishes secrets and classified information—is parallel to the way in which “Survivor Sucks” worked. WikiLeaks like “Survivor Sucks,” has their own knowledge community, but instead of Survivor fans, WikiLeak’s knowledge community consists of 800 worldwide anonymous news sources and high-powered people. Another similar aspect that WikiLeaks shares with “Survivor Sucks” are the five “braintrusts” who work to verify whether the secretive information given from the knowledge community is valid. (We could even go to the extent of labeling Julian Assange as Chillone from “Survivor Sucks.”)

Now the question that Jenkins addresses, is why would we want to create knowledge communities to expose all aspects of democracy and government? In response to this question, Jenkins explicates (through Pierre Lévy’s perspective), “Such knowledge communities are central to the task of restoring democratic citizenship….The sharing of knowledge around the world is the best way of breaking down the divisions and suspicions that currently shape international relations” (29). In addition to Jenkins, WikiLeaks further explains that its purpose is to expose oppressive regimes and to reveal unethical behavior of governments and corporations (http://mirror.wikileaks.info/). With this in mind, another question comes to mind. Is it beneficial for WikiLeak’s knowledge community to expose our governmental flaws worldwide? That is the question that has caused much debate, and has caused a love-hate relationship with WikiLeaks.

When our government was exposed through WikiLeaks, Obama and other government administrators had a taste of what is to come with the advent of our powerful convergence culture, knowledge communities, and technology. WikiLeaks undermined certain aspects of our government by exposing our flaws and even gave away our future foreign policy plans for North Korea. Thus, we see why the knowledge community can be a great device for revealing corruption. However, it could be a bad thing if the knowledge community is exposing our foreign policy plans worldwide when our government is trying to be secretive with these plans so that the United States can continue to be a “Super power.”

Ultimately, we cannot escape our convergence culture, knowledge communities, or technology. In preparing for the future, Jenkins highlights that, “We are in a period of “apprenticeship” through which we innovate and explore the structures that will support political and economic life in the future” (29). We will find more knowledge communities and more braintrusts that will continue to restore democracy, and may even operate as a form of governance.